This site, and literally HUNDREDS of mirror sites on four continents in nearly fifty different countries, are all focused on what can be reasonably termed "the dirtiest trial of the 20th century." To date, Reed Elsevier has hacked dozens of these Who's Who Worldwide Registry sites, which explains why hundreds of slightly differing versions were created and uploaded.
There are many fascinating twists to this story, and updates that must compel the attention of a thinking mind. Follow the dirt and dirty deeds, the misdirection and misinformation, the world-class philanthropy you'd NEVER expect to be anonymously promoted reaching world-class, record-shattering levels, and even now, it's still in force anonymously, feeding countless thousands and thousands and thousands of starving people. Oh, your attention will be grabbed, provided you pick up the string. It's all on you.
Should you be one of the rare few who believes in the system created in America for redress and correction of error and judgement,
be good enough to pick up your pen or phone, email or telegram, and demand pardons for the six Who's-Who-er's" as they were affectionely known. They were salespeople, never decision-makers, policy-makers, or as court testimony and evidence definitely demonstrated, never even aware of even the tiniest detail of what Gordon and his accountant were doing behind the scenes. Seventy-dollar socks, indeed!
If not in actuality the dirtiest trial of the twentieth century, it certainly comes close. The corruption of a postal inspector, the suborning of a federal judge who's previously enjoyed a good reputation for being, as one prosecutor referred to him, "not too unreasonable for a federal judge." An appeals decision that never even mentions six of the defendants, who had nothing to do with the two primary defendants except work as stellar, role model employess who personified integrity in their day to day work, something incontrovertibly revealed at trial.
There is more than ample evidence, seen in the circuit court of appeals split decision, that at least federal circuit court of appeals Judge Parker "subjected his decision to external influences."
You can read between the lines as you wish, the decision, beyond its onerous implications of judicial impropriety at the second-highest level of the American federal court system, never once even MENTIONS the six co-defendants who were professional, excellent employees.
We ask YOU to mention them.
Please, seek pardons for people whose lives have been crushed by the greed and corruption of the powerful few. |
